Brought to you by
publisher of MPA News and
Marine Ecosystems & Management (MEAM)

The EBM Toolbox: "In-the-water" tools for MSP

News

By Sarah Carr

[Editor's note: The goal of The EBM Toolbox is to promote awareness of tools for facilitating EBM.  It is brought to you by the EBM Tools Network, an alliance of tool users, developers, and training providers.]

A number of my previous EBM Toolbox columns have covered tools that can be used for marine spatial planning.  But a survey conducted this year by the EBM Tools Network and OpenChannels.org provides a wealth of information on which tools MSP practitioners are actually using.  It also examines why, in some cases, MSP processes are not using tools. 

We received 124 complete responses to the survey, and the tools the respondents mentioned using ran the gamut from open source GIS to aerial photography.  The vast majority, however, were geospatial analysis tools.  Some highlights from the survey:

• 73% of respondents are using or did use tools for their MSP processes, and 31% are using more than one tool for their MSP process or processes.

• Respondents mentioned roughly 70 different tools.  However, only six were mentioned by more than two respondents: GIS, Marxan, Marxan with Zones, MarineMap, Oregon MarineMap, and SeaSketch.

• Many processes are conducting their own custom geospatial analyses using GIS either in addition to "off-the-shelf" tools or in lieu of them.

• Tools are being used for a wide range of tasks including designing, optimizing, and selecting marine protected area sites and networks; finding appropriate areas for offshore renewable energy infrastructure; zoning marine areas; discovering and collecting data; mapping habitats and marine species distributions; assessing areas of current and potential use conflict between diverse human uses and ecological function; collecting information from stakeholders; and helping stakeholders create, evaluate, and share alternative management scenarios

• The vast majority of respondents (95%) say tools have definitely or mostly helped their process.

• In cases where MSP projects are not using tools, the following reasons were cited for the non-use: it is too early in their process to have started using tools; cost of tools; lack of familiarity with tools; lack of appropriate tools; lack of data; lack of time; or their process does not need tools.

Full results - including benefits, challenges, and lessons learned from using tools - can be found at http://openchannels.org/blogs/msp-tools

Sarah Carr is coordinator for the EBM Tools Network.  Learn more about EBM tools and the EBM Tools Network at www.ebmtools.org

Add new comment

Sign-in with your OpenChannels Member Account and sign-up for email notifications of news. Simply visit any news post and click the "Subscribe to updates of new content of this type" link just above the comments section.